In February, 2009, we had a house fire in Monroe, Iowa. IMT insurance company recommended Paul Davis Restoration (PDR) to clean up and rebuild our home. After a few months of dissatifaction with the quality of their work, an agreement was reached that terminated the services of PDR. We then began the process of trying to obtain the remaining insurance money that PDR was paid up front to complete the entire project. 20% of the insurance settlement was considered the overhead costs and profit for PDR. Although PDR only completed a little over half of the total project line items, they kept all of the original overhead costs and profit payments. We think this is unfair and an example of insurance fraud. 12916ca



  Comments (3)
1. Written by Klecko on April 22, 2011 from newark, new jersey, US
I used to work for PDR in NJ and you are correct. They should only keep half of the O+P if only half of the job was completed.
2. Written by Klecko on April 22, 2011 from newark, new jersey, US
I used to work for PDR in NJ and you are correct. They should only keep half of the O+P if only half of the job was completed.
3. Written by Klecko on April 22, 2011 from newark, new jersey, US
I

Comments on Insurance Fraud
• Keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject.

• Personal attacks will be deleted.

• No Links or Scripts.
Name:
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments